advertisement
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 10-11-2011, 02:19 PM #1
OCD guy OCD guy is offline
New Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 1
10 yr Member
OCD guy OCD guy is offline
New Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 1
10 yr Member
Default remand for second hearing

Hi, I received a letter from the appeals council stating that it was remand back to the judge because the decision found that the claimant was capable of performing his past relevant work. social security regulations provide that the essential elements of past relevant work include that it has to have been performed within 15 years prior to adjudication, that it must have lasted long enough for the individual to learn to do it, and it must have been performed at the SGA level. The records shows that it was more than 15 years that I performed that kind of work and this work did not arise to SGA level. So therefore, this work is not past relevant work as required under the social security regulations.

can anyone please tell me if I have a good chance of winning my claim and also how long does it take to get a second hearing date?
OCD guy is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote

advertisement
Old 10-12-2011, 01:06 AM #2
LIT LOVE LIT LOVE is offline
Magnate
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 2,304
10 yr Member
LIT LOVE LIT LOVE is offline
Magnate
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 2,304
10 yr Member
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by OCD guy View Post
Hi, I received a letter from the appeals council stating that it was remand back to the judge because the decision found that the claimant was capable of performing his past relevant work. social security regulations provide that the essential elements of past relevant work include that it has to have been performed within 15 years prior to adjudication, that it must have lasted long enough for the individual to learn to do it, and it must have been performed at the SGA level. The records shows that it was more than 15 years that I performed that kind of work and this work did not arise to SGA level. So therefore, this work is not past relevant work as required under the social security regulations.

can anyone please tell me if I have a good chance of winning my claim and also how long does it take to get a second hearing date?
You do have an attorney, correct? What has he/she said?

The ALJ made an error, so you'll get another bite at the apple. But, without knowing your disability, your functional capacity, your age, your education, past work, etc.

The more info you're willing to provide, the better the response/s you'll receive in turn. If you haven't purchased a book about the SSDI process, then I'd suggest investing in a Nolo's guide.

How long did it take to get your first hearing date? I don't believe you get bumped to the front of the line, so to speak. If you are in danger of eviction or foreclosure, your attorney can request to have your case expedited.
LIT LOVE is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
Old 10-12-2011, 02:44 AM #3
russ1956x russ1956x is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Phoenix, Arizona
Posts: 23
15 yr Member
russ1956x russ1956x is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Phoenix, Arizona
Posts: 23
15 yr Member
Default

[QUOTE=OCD guy;813948]Hi, I received a letter from the appeals council stating that it was remand back to the judge because the decision found that the claimant was capable of performing his past relevant work. social security regulations provide that the essential elements of past relevant work include that it has to have been performed within 15 years prior to adjudication, that it must have lasted long enough for the individual to learn to do it, and it must have been performed at the SGA level. The records shows that it was more than 15 years that I performed that kind of work and this work did not arise to SGA level. So therefore, this work is not past relevant work as required under the social security regulations.

can anyone please tell me if I have a good chance of winning my claim and also how long does it take to get a second hearing date?[/QUO[/I]

I don't know how about your chances, but I have been waiting for a new hearing since july 8, 2010.
russ1956x is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
Old 10-20-2011, 05:03 PM #4
finallywon01 finallywon01 is offline
New Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 2
10 yr Member
finallywon01 finallywon01 is offline
New Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 2
10 yr Member
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by OCD guy View Post
Hi, I received a letter from the appeals council stating that it was remand back to the judge because the decision found that the claimant was capable of performing his past relevant work. social security regulations provide that the essential elements of past relevant work include that it has to have been performed within 15 years prior to adjudication, that it must have lasted long enough for the individual to learn to do it, and it must have been performed at the SGA level. The records shows that it was more than 15 years that I performed that kind of work and this work did not arise to SGA level. So therefore, this work is not past relevant work as required under the social security regulations.

can anyone please tell me if I have a good chance of winning my claim and also how long does it take to get a second hearing date?

I was remanded & won with the same judge a few days ago. If your Dr. will write a narrative and complete a RFC, it helps alot. (One of my Drs. did RFC & another did a 2 page narrative) I got a bench decision. Good luck!
finallywon01 is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
Old 03-28-2012, 04:34 PM #5
karencook8 karencook8 is offline
New Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 3
10 yr Member
karencook8 karencook8 is offline
New Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 3
10 yr Member
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by OCD guy View Post
Hi, I received a letter from the appeals council stating that it was remand back to the judge because the decision found that the claimant was capable of performing his past relevant work. social security regulations provide that the essential elements of past relevant work include that it has to have been performed within 15 years prior to adjudication, that it must have lasted long enough for the individual to learn to do it, and it must have been performed at the SGA level. The records shows that it was more than 15 years that I performed that kind of work and this work did not arise to SGA level. So therefore, this work is not past relevant work as required under the social security regulations.

can anyone please tell me if I have a good chance of winning my claim and also how long does it take to get a second hearing date?
It took me a year to get another hearing date
karencook8 is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
alj hearing anna1446 Social Security Disability 5 03-23-2010 12:59 PM
alj hearing jr45511 Social Security Disability 10 12-13-2009 09:03 PM
hearing woodsman Reflex Sympathetic Dystrophy (RSD and CRPS) 21 08-14-2009 08:36 AM
SS Hearing jllenrad Reflex Sympathetic Dystrophy (RSD and CRPS) 4 08-28-2007 11:11 PM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:41 AM.

Powered by vBulletin • Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

vBulletin Optimisation provided by vB Optimise v2.7.1 (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2024 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
 

NeuroTalk Forums

Helping support those with neurological and related conditions.

 

The material on this site is for informational purposes only,
and is not a substitute for medical advice, diagnosis or treatment
provided by a qualified health care provider.


Always consult your doctor before trying anything you read here.