[lou_lou]

Many of you realize in part we absolutely have a cure for PD -
based on a protein the nouriches the brain called GDNF and there others,
but we will have to fight for them...

Otto Warburg was a 1931 winner of a Nobel Laureate for the Cancer Cure:
here is more info on Cancer
there is a reason this is not off topic!
apoptosis causes Cancer
apoptosis kills our brain cells = during our spiral downward with Parkinson's Disease as well:
info on Warburg: from www.answers.com
Otto Warburg was born in 1883. His father was a doctor and he studied under a Nobel Prize Winner, who helped him advance in his understanding and knowledge in science. He won a Nobel Prize and was award a second. He was unable to except his second Nobel Prize because because he was a Jew during the Hitler regime. Basically Otto Warburg won 2 Nobel Prizes in cancer.



When your doctor gets nominate for a Nobel

Prize or listens to the facts about cancer

then he could say he knows what he is talking

about. Until then his is just mixing poisons

such as Hitler did. Mustard gas. Ask them to mix you

enough mustard gas to make your time short.



Otto Warburg (biochemist) about 30 years after being awarded the first Nobel Prize, he begin working with Dr. Carl Reich on a part time bases. This was between of 1962 and until his death in 1970. They were doing the final experiments regarding cancer and we’re almost ready to produce the book that would have changed the treatment for cancer totally. Seems after his death Dr. Reich was not allowed to even pickup their privately owned equipment or the life saving research. Some 30 years later the privately owned research has not been released to the public.



But Dr. Carl Reich never gave up and some 20 years later he and Robert Barefoot (biochemist) produce “The Calcium Factor”. To simplify the research Robert Barefoot wrote “Death by Diet”. Robert Barefoot being a biochemist such as Otto Warburg has enough knowledge to put the remaining pieces together.



As you read this lecture I want you to realize that Otto Warburg is talking about an enzyme deficiency with cook foods. What basically happens when cooked foods which are enzyme destroyed are eaten, is that it causes the red blood cells to cluster together.



A smaller view is 4 microns in diameter. A red blood cell is 7 microns in diameter. When you feed your family enzyme deficient foods the red blood cells are weaken and stick together in a groups and cannot travel through the smaller veins. This causes the body to have many anaerobic (low or no oxygen areas within the body) that allows cancer to develop. But than, if the your body is towards an alkaline state then the cancer cannot continue to survive because your body is basically more oxygenated.



Cancer basically needs and low oxygen environment to survive. Over the years I have heard about a lot of vegetarians getting cancer. And I'm guessing here, but if the saliva pH test is done I'm sure they will be extremely alkaline. Meaning that acidic or alkaline extremes unnatural to the body are causing a steady low oxygen environment which cancer needs to survive. It can get started and has the environment it needs to continue. Basically 99% of the time a terminal cancer victim body is a thousand time more acidic, then normal. But both these environments are causing a low or no oxygen environment which cancer loves you for. This is causing a low oxygen environment. Which means you are normally calcium deficient. And your cells are oxygen starved.

[lou_lou]

http://nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/m...aureates/1931/

[lou_lou]

The Prime Cause and Prevention of Cancer
with two prefaces on prevention

Revised lecture at the meeting of the Nobel-Laureates on June 30, 1966
at Lindau, Lake Constance, Germany

by
Otto Warburg
Director, Max Planck-Institute for Cell Physiology, Berlin-Dahlem

English Edition by Dean Burk
National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland, USA

The Second Revised Edition
Published by Konrad Triltsch, Würzburg, Germany
1969

Preface to the Second Revised German Edition

of the Lindau Lecture


(The way to prevention of cancer)



Since the Lindau lecture of June 1966 many physicians have examined - not unsuccessfully - the practical consequences of the anaerobiosis of cancer cells. The more who participate in these examinations, the sooner will we know what can be achieved. It is a unique aspect of these examinations that they can be carried out on human patients, on the largest scale, without risk; whereas experiments on animals have been misleading many times. The cure of human cancer will be the resultant of biochemistry of cancer and of biochemistry of man.



A list of selected active groups of respiratory enzymes will soon be published, to which we recently added cytohemin and d-amino-Levulinic acid, the precursor of oxygen-transferring hemins. In the meantime commercial vitamin preparations may be used that contain, besides other substances, many active groups of the respiratory enzymes. Most of these may be added to the food. Cytohemin and vitamin B 12 may be given subcutaneously. (A synonym of "active group" is prosthetic" group of an enzyme.)




--------------------------------------------------------------------------------



There exists no alternative today to the prevention of cancer as proposed at Lindau. It is the way that attacks the prime cause of cancer most directly and that is experimentally most developed. Indeed millions of experiments in man, through the effectiveness of some vitamins, have shown, that cell respiration is impaired if the active groups of the respiratory enzymes are removed from the food; and that cell respiration is repaired at once, if these groups are added again to the food. No way can be imagined that is scientifically better founded to prevent and cure a disease, the prime cause of which is an impaired respiration. Neither genetic codes of anaerobiosis nor cancer viruses are alternatives today, because no such codes and no such viruses in man have been discovered so far; but anaerobiosis has been discovered8.)




--------------------------------------------------------------------------------



What can be achieved by the active groups, when tumors have already developed? The answer is doubtful, because tumors live in the body almost anaerobically, that is under conditions that the active groups cannot act.

On the other hand, because young metastases live in the body almost aerobically, inhibition by the active groups should be possible. Therefore we propose first to remove all compact tumors, which are the anaerobic foci of the metastasis. Then the active group should be added to the food, in the greatest possible amount, for many years, even forever. This is a promising task. If it succeeds, then cancer will be a harmless disease.




--------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Moreover, we discovered recently a) in experiments with growing cancer cells in vitro that very low concentrations of some selected active groups inhibit fermentation and the growth of cancer cells completely, in the course of a few days. From these experiments it may be concluded that de-differentiated cells die if one tries to normalize their metabolism. It is a result that is unexpected and that encourages the task of inhibiting the growth of metastases with active enzyme groups.

a) In press in Hoppe-Seylers Zeitschrift für Physiologische Chemie 1967. 10 g riboflavin per ccm or 10 g d-Aminolevulinic acid inhibit in vitro growth and fermentation completely but inhibit respiration less. As expected, ascites cancer in vivo is not cured.

[BEMM]

Dear CTenaLouise, this is very interesting. And hopeful. I wonder if Dr. Warburg's theories, which must have been shared by others, and which must have been publicized at the time, were the basis for a strong movement in Denmark in the 1940's to get people to eat raw food....
My Mother was up on all nutrition news, and for a few years we ate most of our vegetables uncooked ( corn! celeriac, you name it - only potatoes turn brown too fast to serve ). I'm sure it was good for us, and I'm sure it was a much watered down interpretation of the scientific ideas behind it. But the time frame and the basic premise reminded me of my years of chomping through raw veggies.
My father would put down his fork and say, "I'm not full, I'm just tired."

birte

[lou_lou]

how funny - your father's humour -
what a great funny statement!!!