View Single Post
Old 11-23-2013, 11:02 AM
soccertese soccertese is offline
Magnate
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 2,531
15 yr Member
soccertese soccertese is offline
Magnate
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 2,531
15 yr Member
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by pegleg View Post
soccertese

this sounds like a good compromise. Am I missing anything?


Benefits of ExAblate Treatment for Parkinson's Disease

1. Focused Ultrasound treatment is non-invasive just like radio-surgery, however it therapeutic effects are immediate and it does not use ionizing radiation and thereby does not have the adverse effect and limitation associated with it.
2. Compared to radio-frequency ablation, focused ultrasound is non-invasive and therefore has significant reduced risk for infection. Also as focused ultrasound is done under closed loop thermal feedback, it is more likely to damage only targeted tissue and spare non-targeted healthy brain.
3. Compared to implantation of deep brain stimulation device, focused ultrasound is a onetime procedure, and does not require subsequent procedure to replace batteries. Focused Ultrasound also does not involve implantation of a foreign body, and thereby carries a reduced risk of blood clots creation.
4. Since there is no need to insert electrodes or needles the collateral damage to the brain is reduced

source: http://www.insightec.com/Parkinson_Disease.html
your're describing surgery with ultrasound, destroying a part of the brain,
the photo treatment wouldn't kill cells, just dissolve the lewy bodies i assume.
or like with some experimental treatments, you pretreat the cells with a chemical that binds with the proteins, the chemical absorbs the light and then might breakdown the protein.

http://fusfoundation.org/focused-ult...insons-disease
soccertese is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote