View Single Post
Old 11-26-2013, 09:25 AM
olsen's Avatar
olsen olsen is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,860
15 yr Member
olsen olsen is offline
Senior Member
olsen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,860
15 yr Member
Default accuracy of 23andme testing

a report from an N of 1. A geneticist whom we consulted for interpretation/recommendations about my husband's genomic results from 23andme demanded retesting from his source prior to the appointment. The results from both entities were exactly the same. The one difference: we had to pay a lot more than $99 for the lab tests from the geneticist's source.
I know 23andme has been well funded; i cannot imagine this company producing a product that is inaccurate. Perhaps I am naive.
I am so impressed with the FDA's concern about my receiving information about mutations that impact drug metabolism. And that I might stop a drug that is reported to be inadequately detoxified from the body because of a mutation. This was an actual expressed concern over individuals using information from 23andme--the drug metabolism information. I can only wish we had that info prior to my husband taking Lipitor!
__________________
In the last analysis, we see only what we are ready to see, what we have been taught to see. We eliminate and ignore everything that is not a part of our prejudices.

~ Jean-Martin Charcot


The future is already here — it's just not very evenly distributed. William Gibson
olsen is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
"Thanks for this!" says:
lab rat (11-27-2013), mrsD (11-26-2013), soccertese (11-26-2013)