View Single Post
Old 08-28-2014, 10:25 PM
chgs chgs is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Posts: 12
8 yr Member
chgs chgs is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Posts: 12
8 yr Member
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mark in Idaho View Post
Studies also show that those athletes who recover to their baseline in Computerized Neurocognitive Testing (ImPACT or CNS Vital Signs) still show signs of brain injury weeks later with other testing systems.

It does not mean we should lose hope. Just that our hope should be realistic and we should be careful about the risks and stresses we take on in our future.

85% recover from all symptoms within 6 weeks or so. But, this does not mean they can tolerate stressors without a return of symptoms.
Mark, can you show me the links to the relevant literature? I have journal access so I can read the full text and look at the methodology and results.

A very recent study actually supports your hypothesis at the 60 day mark!

doi: 10.1249/MSS.0000000000000462

I am still going through that study (a lot of words to read), but I would appreciate any other studies that I can look at.

Journal research is the kind of information I prioritize.

Will there ever be a point (e.g. 1 year's time) where all nuerocognitive testing does not show any anomalies? Has this ever been documented?

Thank you for your help!
chgs is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote