Quote:
Originally Posted by Mark in Idaho
LIT LOVE,
If you would read the thread starting at http://neurotalk.psychcentral.com/thread210551.html, you see that we were helping her along the process. Head injuries are quite different than other disabilities. The applicant can be 100% functional from every observable standard until they try to process the tasks of a full time job. The disabling issues are most commonly related to pace and persistence. They may be able to complete all of the job tasks at a high level for a short period of time but they often can not maintain the pace needed or be at that high functioning level every day. Sometimes, behavioral issues can interfere with employability. Sometimes, it is an inability to tolerate the work environment.
Nolo Presses publications are just paraphrased repeats of the SSDI Blue Book. I find the Blue Book easier to read.
The SSDI process can be difficult due to the cognitive struggles we usually have. Having an experienced SSDI attorney to help is valuable. |
I read the entire thread before my first post. I have researched TBI in the past while helping someone with their application, so I'm familiar with many of the issues--and the reason why I recognized a claim that her job was an Unsuccessful Work Attempt was appropriate.
I'm confused by what you're even upset about? That I suggested a non-attorney rep might be helpful this early in the process? Is your opinion that the OP should hire an attorney, but should be how far along into the process before she tries? Another option is to find an attorney provided for free by an Advocacy Group--often available in large cities for these types of claims.
You have an easier time reading the Blue Book. Many people, even those without cognitive issues, struggle with the Blue Book. Most of the authors on NOLO are experienced SSDI attorneys and they impart their experiences as well. I'm not sure why more than one option is a problem.