Enna,
Yes, I remember you telling me about the enamel problem with some teeth. It sounds like this molar is in very bad shape and because the infection can become a major health concern, it is not wise to keep this tooth.
I am guessing that the reason your dentist does not want to be the one to remove this tooth has nothing to do with science, it is because he's not experienced enough to feel comfortable enough to remove it safely. Also, this tooth may be very brittle and a bit tedious to remove.
It is in your best interest to see an oral surgeon to remove this molar. It would also be wise to discuss the benefits of having a mild IV sedation for the removal. The IV sedation used in dentistry in the office is not general anesthesia. It is referred to as a twlight sedation. The patient is asleep during the dentistry and will have no recollection of it. But will wake up more easily afterwards compared to general meds. The expense to remove this tooth is a lot because you are a "special" case
If you keep the tooth, you keep the infection. So if that concerns you, then it's best to have the tooth removed and only by the oral surgeon.
Bryanna
Quote:
Originally Posted by Enna70
The molar can't be saved. The enamal dissolved very close to the gum line and a small infection. Because I can only use one side of my jaw, the molar is also dying from so much use.
Also, the range of opening isn't as most.
The dentist mentioned that he was worried that if he extracted molar there could be an issue for the reconstructed mandible on the opposite side.
They sent me to an oral surgeon who wants close to $1,000 to extract that molar.
Sorry don't think I can download an xray....haven't figured out how to have a pic of me.  |