Exactly. There wasn't an extreme case. There was an overly eager surgeon who actually said before the operation hmmm where should I take the gum from and he chose the procedure because he remembered he could take gum from there not because of the hole itself. According to him the only reason the first operation wasn't successful might be because of a piece of sharp bone around the area where the gum tissue used during the first surgery might have broke so he took care of that. He had no idea of the consequences he would be causing. There is a reason he left. It wasn't an extreme hole or anything else going on he clearly chose an unnecessary procedure. Thank you for clearing that up for me. I also wish everyone was like you but they are not Bryanna. There might not be a good, noble reason behind his actions. He simply might not be good. Thank you again, for everything.