NeuroTalk Support Groups - View Single Post

soccertese · 09-18-2015, 08:28 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by billbobby21

I personally am on this protocol for the treatment of concussion related issues. my case is rather complex with multiple areas of the brain being affected, thus it has taken us awhile to narrow in on the correct dosage needed for alleviation of my symptoms. What I can say though is that I have thoroughly done my research on this protocol and from everything I have read, this to me looks like one of the most profound medical discoveries as of recent history. They have 19 peer-reviewed medical papers that outline their findings as well as being both Cma and ama certified. I cannot say for 100% certainty that it works simply because I have not had to work for me yet, but I do believe to a 99% rate that it is legitimate. And if what they are proposing is correct then we are looking at not only the complete management and resolution of parkinsons disease, but any neurotransmitter related disease. As seen on their website at https://neurosupport.files.wordpress...lticolored.jpg. This is huge.

I will leave a few links to a few of their papers that are focused on parkinsons disease that you may be interested in reading. I would highly suggest following through with doing this protocol, I very much believe that you will find great success and results in doing so. make sure you stick with it and dont give up on it even if it takes multiple months for it to work. Id appreciate if you could report back with how it works for your father in a few months if possible. I wish you well.

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3068871/
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4211847/
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4238750/
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4266417/
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4113308/
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3355850/

just curious, you don't have parkinsons's, you never posted here before, how did this thread come to your attention?
i'm only going to say peer reviewed is not the same as scientifically proven. you rarely see a drug study done by the company done by the company making the drug as was the case in all these studies. most of the articles aren't actual "trials" but opinion pieces.

i admittedly didn't study these papers, just glanced at them. i found this excerpt hard to believe, general concensus is anything over 250/mg per dose is not going to add anything yet this patient is getting over 10,000mg?

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4113308/
"Changing the daily L-dopa dosing value by 120 mg can have dramatic clinical results. In general, this is independent of the size of the daily L-dopa dose. For example, a patient was taking 10,800 mg of L-dopa per day (equivalent to 90, 120 mg L-dopa pills) in the competitive inhibition state. The patient reported being frozen in the chair and unable to stand. After a pill stop the patient was placed on 89 pills per day (10,680 mg of L-dopa). After a daily decrease in the L-dopa dosing value of only 120 mg, the patient was able to rise without assistance and ambulate. These results are common, not rare."