|
Member
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2015
Posts: 204
|
|
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2015
Posts: 204
|
Dr. Harch claims that the reason the military's study came out inconclusive is because they did not follow the right protocol for the proper treatment regimen and so the results were skewed. Dr. Harch says that the military did not want the results to be positive because they did not want to have to pay for HBOT as a treatment for all the veterans.
Congress appropriated funds for Dr. Harch's current study to get a clear understanding of the effectiveness of HBOT.
He has written a lengthy article refuting the military's study, all of which I do not understand because of all the scientific jargon. He says the results are not inconclusive if the treatment is done right and that 90% of those he has treated with PCS showed significant improvement.
Just wanted to let you know the other side of the story.
__________________
Injury: March 2014. Hit hard on top of head by heavy metal farm tool. LOC. MRIs and Cat Scans clear. PCS ever since. 33 year old female. Trying to stay positive!
Persisting Problems:
fatigue, dizziness, lightheadedness, vestibular balance and vision problems, vision static, tinnitus, hearing loss, slight sensitivity to noise, sometimes the insomnia comes back, sensitivity to stress, exercise intolerance, emotional problems - But I still have much to be thankful for.
|