View Single Post
Old 02-09-2016, 09:37 PM
Merl1n Merl1n is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Posts: 68
10 yr Member
Merl1n Merl1n is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Posts: 68
10 yr Member
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by pogo View Post
Hi Merl1n,

I don't recall if you've mentioned when you were first shunted. For those shunted as children, slit ventricles are documented issue. My child has a history of slit ventricles / low compliance so when I tell surgeons that I clearly follow up by noting that imaging can miss what's going on, history of at least one obstruction without enlarged ventricles, yadda yadda... Then the surgeon on call is warned up front that symptoms are more important than images. I asked our child's surgeon to measure pressure during the surgery because I thought there could be a problem with the programmable valve. I know that isn't a completely accurate measure but I think it helped. He indicated it would mean chucking the old programmable and you know how conservative surgeons can be about things. Sometimes I think that is part of the patient problem when trying to get an issue addressed, our risk assessment is different from their risk assessment and QOL then tanks. Our past issues with the programmables is they get harder to reprogram (codmans not the strata we first had, but strata has big steps between settings that don't work) after a few MRIs. But the fixed pressure valves are also not an option because the pressures have been changing, actually have one of each in her shunt system. There is a reason OSV is not a good choice anymore but I've forgotten why. Bet there are more than a few adults who also have issues with imaging not telling the full story, they just don't have studies telling the docs about ways this comes out.

I don't think the number of revisions matters, our child's hospital experiences are rather mild compared to people with other conditions, just wish there were fewer doctors to deal with So it's just something we deal with. I think the parents whose child goes 20 years without a problem are more affected by a sudden shunt crisis. We aren't under the same illusions.

-pogo
Hey Pogo,
My initial shunt was inserted at age 24, there had been issues/symptoms for the 24 yrs prior to this but none were investigated until one day whilst driving down the road I had a massive bright light in my sight and within 10minutes I couldn't see. My then girlfriend (now wife) took me to the dr and ordered him to do a scan, which he reluctantly agreed to do. At the time MRI was new technology, so a CT scan was performed. This showed a large area of fluid, but being CT it was not well defined. Post surgery another scan was performed which showed the fluid had been reduced but that there was a large mass still present within the ventricular space. 3 months later I was in having further surgery to reduce the size of the mass. I was having some awful symptoms but the dr's had operated, the dr's had fixed, my symptoms were again labelled psychosomatic "It's all in your head..."
Fast forward 16yrs and the shunt had fractured, they operated again and replaced the shunt. Things were not good at all post surgery. I saw my PCP, who again stated '...dr's had operated, the dr's had fixed..' but when I went for a routine scan and follow up with the surgeon things were far from OK. I had developed 'slit ventricle syndrome'. The surgeon was less than impressed and queried why I had not been to see him sooner. Problem being that to see him I needed a referral from my PCP, the same PCP who wrote my symptoms off. Grrrrr. So 3 weeks later I was back in hospital having yet further surgery. Since then things have not been good, OK, so if I'm honest things have been bloody terrible. I have not been able to return to my previous employment and now have been told it is highly unlikely I'll ever work again. For me its all a case of management. Pain management, medication management, symptom management. I've given up on the dr's having answers. They have theories, not answers, hell, I can workout the theories vs symptoms better than they can and that's without me having scans/pictures to view and diagnose. But as far as they are concerned, I'm just the patient, I wouldn't know. They have done years of study, they know more than me, so my opinion is ignored until they have images. Bloody dr's.

Merl1n

Last edited by Merl1n; 02-10-2016 at 05:58 AM.
Merl1n is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote