View Single Post
Old 02-10-2016, 11:02 AM
DavidHC DavidHC is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2015
Posts: 732
8 yr Member
DavidHC DavidHC is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2015
Posts: 732
8 yr Member
Default

I think that's right, reducing refined carbs and processed foods, etc. is a huge start, and bound to result in great improvement. So that's part of it. But animal sources of food have certain beneficial micronutrients that are lacking in plant food, and that's what would worry me most, aside from the fact that grains and legumes (and even seeds and nuts in high quantities) have high levels of antinutrients (e.g., phytic acid) and are not the best sources for the nutrients that they do offer (veggies being much better). But if people are seeing improvement and better health from such diets, then by all means. The human body and nutrition itself are quite complex, and there's much we don't know.

And thanks so much for sending the paper.


Quote:
Originally Posted by stillHoping View Post
I don’t know which nutrition is healthier in the long run, the one that you chose or mine. Maybe it is the reduction of processed food, refined carbs, sugar etc. in both of the methods.
I know many people that their health was improved when they based their nutrition on veggies, legumes, fruits, nuts etc. and these are also the recommendations of the AICR (American Institute for Cancer Research).



I can access it and will send you the paper
DavidHC is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote