|
Grand Magnate
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 3,319
|
|
Grand Magnate
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 3,319
|
I am inclined to believe the report of the DiPALS committee is intended primarily as an alert to a possible problem and not a referendum on the pacer because they do not criticize the lead surgical team, only the United States Food and Drug Administration (possibly because their HUD/HDE approval did not take into account the possibility the pacer might be implanted but not activated).
|