View Single Post
Old 07-23-2007, 01:19 AM
indigogo's Avatar
indigogo indigogo is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: "all the way over on the West Coast"
Posts: 1,032
15 yr Member
indigogo indigogo is offline
Senior Member
indigogo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: "all the way over on the West Coast"
Posts: 1,032
15 yr Member
Default braver than I

Hey Carolyn -

I just learned today about your participation in this trial. I am so thankful for your bravery on behalf of all of us. I am not so brave. Not only would I not offer myself up for experimental brain surgery because of fear that I would be receiving the sham - my fear would also keep me away from the real thing! There is also a risk from the treatment itself. I am not willing to take that risk; I am grateful for those who do. I agree with Howard - this is the new frontier. All clinical trials participants are pioneers.

Sham surgery is a necessary risk for informed patients under our current system - it's those who actually receive the surgery plus treatment who are putting themselves at the most risk.

Is there really a movement now underway in the scientific community to abandon sham surgery in favor of another control protocol? Or is this question being asked to get information to improve the informed consent process?

I think any advocacy effort made to make sure the informed consent process is as thorough and secure as possible is time well spent. My thanks to those of you who are so involved.
__________________
Carey

“Cautious, careful people, always casting about to preserve their reputation and social standing, never can bring about a reform. Those who are really in earnest must be willing to be anything or nothing in the world’s estimation, and publicly and privately, in season and out, avow their sympathy with despised and persecuted ideas and their advocates, and bear the consequences.” — Susan B. Anthony
indigogo is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote