another minor adjustment: three individuals appear in the data set but had not indicated their consideration of the pacer; one of them did not have symptoms, so I removed them from the numerical totals because there must be evidence of a prognosis and actual consideration of the pacer . . . this makes the 6,000 threshold a tie at this time also (also at six and six). Another individual was similarly situated in the 7,000 bracket so they too were removed from the numerical total and now the new totals are one did and three apparently considered the intervention but no indication they tried it was discovered as yet.