Member
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 486
|
|
Member
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 486
|
Vicc,
I believe there has been article upon article submitted onto this site that does explain why RSD maybe the result of traumatic nerve injury. I have no intention of reposting them again. I believe all of those who are interested in the possible causes and treatment of this disease have accessed them, read them and come to their own conclusions.
As you are asking for us to prove this common theory about RSD , I am simply asking you for the same about your theory.
You are accusing people of deliberately, maliciously and constantly misquoting you, if this is your perception then can you not see that you could be doing the exact same to others?
Your condescending comment on those medical practitoners who may prescribe "dangerous anti-psychotics" is frivilous in the extreme as they do so because they have had patients who respond well with little or no side effects. To insist that they would continue this practice if they had patients becoming unwell because of their treatments is just another indication of your disdain for any other medical opinion other than the ones subscribed to by you.
I am speaking only for myself here but I will usually happily undertake any treatment that I have thoroughly researched and established that the outcome may well and truly be worth the miniscule risk involved.
You may disagree but I can assure you I have come to no harm in my quest for an answer to this disease and I have probably tried and tested almost everything available that has been offered.
Tayla
|