And I think the devil will most certainly be in the details. I can already hear the argument that while the cellular damage pattern of certain chemicals in vitro may well match that found in individual blood samples, indicating that an individual is chemically damaged, there is still no direct evidence that the particular DANA damage pattern is linkable with particular conditions. In other words, the individual shows chemical damage that indisputably shows toxic exposure, but does that exposure result in this claimant's disease.

I'm sure the insurance companies will try to throw the burden of proof for the linkage back on the plaintiffs.

I'd love to look at the technical specs of this testing process (being the geeky nerd that I am); are there any ways to find it?