Originally Posted by euphonia

My completely non-statistical but minutiae obsessed brain reads the above quote as "up to 45% reduction" in active lesions of patients on CRABs, meaning that the best result in the treated patients was 45%, with no average listed. And that the average lesion reduction in patients receiving nothing at all was still 20%.

I'd always hoped that at least some people were doing better than that on the meds.

Anyone want to comment or clarify? With the same percentages for all the meds, it always seems to me that the CRABs work (modestly) on the same subset of patients and the rest of us maybe have a different form of the disease. I'd rather they'd spend more time on figuring out what we've got.