View Single Post
Old 10-29-2007, 03:59 PM
indigogo's Avatar
indigogo indigogo is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: "all the way over on the West Coast"
Posts: 1,032
15 yr Member
indigogo indigogo is offline
Senior Member
indigogo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: "all the way over on the West Coast"
Posts: 1,032
15 yr Member
Default translational medicine

I just said this:

Quote:
Originally Posted by indigogo View Post
That's just the point - it's not old news to most researchers. Or else it's known but they have chosen to ignore it. That's why I think it's so provocative - because it bucks the prevailing trend/wisdom of mainstream research. But a few voices are starting to speak up - Bill Langston from the Parkinson's Institute is one - he uses the Braak stages (another maverick) as the basis for the talks he gives lately. Hopefully it's an old theory that will take on a new life.
But now also wondering if it is a result of the long term failure of translating what basic research says into what the clinician does with the patient. There are a lot of docs out there who view PD and PD treatment as simply a matter of dopamine loss and replacement.

"Translational Medicine" is the new thing at the NIH - very much needed and over due!
__________________
Carey

“Cautious, careful people, always casting about to preserve their reputation and social standing, never can bring about a reform. Those who are really in earnest must be willing to be anything or nothing in the world’s estimation, and publicly and privately, in season and out, avow their sympathy with despised and persecuted ideas and their advocates, and bear the consequences.” — Susan B. Anthony
indigogo is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote