raster:
http://searchsmb.techtarget.com/sDef...212871,00.html
Raster graphics have pixels....curves are not clean, and show the pixel edges.
They are bitmaps and very detailed and for fixing details by the pixel are
very perfectionistic and good for photo retouching. Making them smaller however, into a jpeg loses definition. Bitmap files are typically quite large.
Vector graphics have very clean edges...the pixels don't show.
http://searchvb.techtarget.com/sDefi...213284,00.html
Vectors can be enlarged or made smaller without much loss of detail.
And so vector files are best for fonts.
I find it very confusing too. You have to really work with them to see the differences.
There is something about the color densities too, I think raster has more. But don't quote me on that.
__________________
All truths are easy to understand once they are discovered; the point is to discover them.-- Galileo Galilei
************************************
.
Weezie looking at petunias 8.25.2017
****************************
These forums are for mutual support and information sharing only. The forums are not a substitute for medical advice, diagnosis or treatment provided by a qualified health care provider. Always consult your doctor before trying anything you read here.