As a participant in the CERE-120 trial, I would like to know how this European-based trial gene-therapy differs from CERE-120 (Neuturin) or glutamic acid decarboxylase (GAD) gene? GAD recently completed Phase I.
Is this pre-trial data, or Phase I data...doesn't seem clear in the press release. The long-term post-Phase I data for Neuturin appears to have the same effect as ProSavin. Or am I wrong in my assumption? It appears to say that Phase I/II will commence.
Quote:
Long-term efficacy data in the industry-standard preclinical model of Parkinson’s disease have shown that ProSavin induces almost complete recovery of movement function and other behavioural measurements. In this model, the therapeutic effect of ProSavin following a single administration has been maintained for over 24 months with no diminishment.
|