Originally Posted by dahlek

We hear, read learn about many good and bad experiences about finding the good, bad and the downright UGLY in the neuro's we encounter when we get diagnosed...
Maybe I should post this as three categories?
1- What constitutes to YOU as a good neuro's qualities?
2- What constitutes to YOU a bad or indifferent neuro's qualities?
3- Worst of all, What constitutes the WORST qualities of some neuros?

There ARE good neuros out there....but IF we don't just post it publicly, no one will ever know what the well...'warning' signs are?

I know from my own misadventures into diagnosis-land that I had some solid ...umm? near-misses. I admit I am far more fortunate than many. I still call my 'first' neuro, [as does my husband] 'the quack, or ambulance chaser'...need I say more? [I mean, the guy is always being 'paged' while I'm in the hospital...no matter what the reason I am there?] I don't miss him one whit!
Any and all input and comments are welcome! Get it out of your systems! Consider it therapy or something? HA - j