View Single Post
Old 02-07-2008, 02:53 AM
Peter B Peter B is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Perth, Western Australia
Posts: 376
15 yr Member
Peter B Peter B is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Perth, Western Australia
Posts: 376
15 yr Member
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lily View Post
I was wondering if anyone else had been through a struggle to prove and identify any illness that had affected the immune system. Symptoms such as blurred vision, neurological dysfunction, sleep problems, malabsorption, etc. which sometimes don't show up in testing. In some cases testing is denied based on a doctor's opinion that it just isn't there--especially if the patient was already stamped as being depressed and anxious, which can accompany an authentic illness. I was just diagnosed with Somatization disorder and denied necessary testing that has left me with neurological problems which will undoubtedly now show up in testing, if I can convince a primary care physician to give me a referral. The somatization disorder description fits the criteria for many illnesses such as Gulf War Syndrome, pesticide exposure, or a number of other immune system disorders. Has anyone else ever been in this situation and fought it? I'm sure there are a few people out there that are hypochondriacs, but in this day and age when there are so many toxins in the environment and in our foods, the Somatization Disorder stamp seems like an easy write off to deny someone the use of their insurance and to explain an open-ended question which a doctor can't answer--what is it? I would be interested to know if anyone actually was able to legally fight a Somatization write off when they found proof of their illness and had been denied medical help.
Lily, you have hit the nail on the head with the insurance denial thing. Here is a quote from the Smoke and Mirrors article in my daughter's website, which I STRONGLY advise you to look at as it may be extremely helpful to you.

"A political decision was taken to rename M.E. as "chronic fatigue syndrome", the cardinal feature of which was to be chronic or on going "fatigue", a symptom so universal that any insurance claim based on "tiredness" could be expediently denied. The new case definition bore little relation to M.E.: objections were raised by experienced international clinicians and medical scientists, but all objections were ignored. To the serious disadvantage of patients, these psychiatrists have propagated untruths and falsehoods about the disorder to the medical, legal, insurance and media communities, as well as to Government Ministers and to Members of Parliament, resulting in the withdrawal and erosion of both social and financial support [for M.E. patients]. (2001, [Online) "

Last edited by Curious; 02-12-2008 at 01:21 PM. Reason: mod edit required
Peter B is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote