Thread: PubMed - 2006
View Single Post
Old 10-06-2006, 12:13 PM
valeriemates's Avatar
valeriemates valeriemates is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 58
15 yr Member
valeriemates valeriemates is offline
Junior Member
valeriemates's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 58
15 yr Member
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jccglutenfree View Post
I used to hear in a perfect world that anti-endomysial and anti-tTG should be consistent, but they aren't always.
The thing that bothers me about the endomysial test is that it's done by labs all over the place, but it's only accurate if it's interpreted by a highly trained special technician -- which most labs don't have. So most EMA test results are about as valid as flipping a coin. What in the world is the point of even *doing* a test that is known to be that inaccurate? Sigh....

Quote:
Originally Posted by jccglutenfree View Post
...negative testing one year can turn positive a year later. I'm glad you did pester your doctor!
I am glad too. But I believe that my daughter had active celiac disease when they did the first test, too, and the test was only negative because the EMA is a very inaccurate test.

-Valerie
valeriemates is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote