View Single Post
Old 02-28-2008, 12:49 PM
gigglebabe's Avatar
gigglebabe gigglebabe is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Tennessee
Posts: 111
15 yr Member
gigglebabe gigglebabe is offline
Member
gigglebabe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Tennessee
Posts: 111
15 yr Member
Default

I wish I could agree with you. But no, he plainly stated to me, that once they burnt the uterus, it would be basically burnt together, more or less melting it inside, and they would not be able to see inside again. And that I am not for. Not with having history of cancer there in my family. I would much rather do the freezing. Basically because of the family history. I went into great detail with him about what would happen, would he be able to go back into the uterus after this burning, and he made sure I knew he wouldn't be able to. That was why I chose to write the ins. company to see if they would change their minds. I'm hoping they will.

Thanks
Debbie

Quote:
Originally Posted by tayla4me View Post
Hi Debbie,

I am a bit confused about what you said. Uterine Ablation should not prevent further follow up investigation of your uterus. Only if you have a full hysterectomy with removal of your cervix will there be a hinderance to vaginal hysteroscope.
They should still also be able to laparoscope you abdominally.
It is important for you as you said, because your history demands you have regular investigations.
Perhaps your doctor has not explained himself very well to you
Wishing you well and an answer to this problem.
Cheers Tayla
__________________
'If we don't believe in free expression for people we despise, we don't believe in it at all."
gigglebabe is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote