View Single Post
Old 04-14-2008, 05:16 PM
lady_express_44's Avatar
lady_express_44 lady_express_44 is offline
Grand Magnate
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Vancouver, Canada
Posts: 3,300
15 yr Member
lady_express_44 lady_express_44 is offline
Grand Magnate
lady_express_44's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Vancouver, Canada
Posts: 3,300
15 yr Member
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Riverwild View Post
They did reverse this decision for the time being and return the money people paid when it was first changed.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Riverwild View Post
Our state has decided that their most vulnerable citizens are the first, best place to start with the 200 million dollar budget shortfall. This includes disabled people on Medicare/Medicaid, MH and MR patients, the elderly and uninsured children.

Can you explain what you mean, Riverwild? What do mean by "reversed the decision" and 'how' they are going to reduce budgets off the back of the disabled on Medicare, etc.?


Quote:
Originally Posted by Riverwild View Post
Something's gotta give. There's got to be a better way.

Well, if you can't trust your government to look after the people, who can you trust? What a horrible predicament.

The only way something is going to change is if Americans all band together and demand equal health care for all your citizens. Of course this costs money (increased taxes) and will likely have to result in lower expectations . . but it ensures that everyoine is taken care of.

On American Idol last week, they said that 50 million people in the US are under-insured now. That's a lot of people that need a lot of help . . . and doesn't even include the one's that might be adversely affected by reductions to co-pays, etc. that might happen.

Cherie
__________________
I am not a Neurologist, Physician, Nurse, or Hairdresser ... but I have learned that it is not such a great idea to give oneself a haircut after three margaritas
.
lady_express_44 is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote