 |
Member
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Seattle area
Posts: 695
|
|
Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Seattle area
Posts: 695
|
At this point it is not a given I will even have the biopsies. My neuro doing the EMG/NCV testing just mentioned them when I asked what else can be used to find the cause if the tests he was performing we inconclusive.
Will the treatment be significantly different if I do or do not have them done? What I mean is, once it has become an issue of small fiber damage, aren't there basically a set of treatment options that really do not change if you have the test or if you don't?
__________________
We live in a rainbow of chaos. ~Paul Cezanne .
|