View Single Post
Old 09-05-2006, 04:47 AM
indigogo's Avatar
indigogo indigogo is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: "all the way over on the West Coast"
Posts: 1,032
15 yr Member
indigogo indigogo is offline
Senior Member
indigogo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: "all the way over on the West Coast"
Posts: 1,032
15 yr Member
Default wading in

Hey Paula -

wikipedia is a fun place to learn about political labels. On one of your earlier posts in forum feedback you were bothered by the term "neocon" (my interpretation of your post; not sure I am correct) - and I didn't know why. Here's the wikipedia entry for "neoconservatism"

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neoconservative

Like any other political label, "neocon" can be applied negatively, positively, or neutrally - depending on the person using the term. But it is a legitimate term with a long American history - and is an important influence today, good or bad.

"Liberal" is another polarizing label - it can be said with much negative connotation and meaning. It's much easier for me to just embrace the term - warts and all!

It might be good for all of us to become educated on the real and legitimate definitions of political terms rather than to just use them as weapons. Maybe then we can get beyond mudslinging, name calling, and on to real and useful discussion.

cheers!
__________________
Carey

“Cautious, careful people, always casting about to preserve their reputation and social standing, never can bring about a reform. Those who are really in earnest must be willing to be anything or nothing in the world’s estimation, and publicly and privately, in season and out, avow their sympathy with despised and persecuted ideas and their advocates, and bear the consequences.” — Susan B. Anthony
indigogo is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote