View Single Post
Old 08-25-2008, 08:56 PM
Bearygood Bearygood is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 970
15 yr Member
Bearygood Bearygood is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 970
15 yr Member
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by lady_express_44 View Post
If I remember correctly . . . he thought it had something to do with "them" wanting to keep the numbers down so that it would still be a "orphan disease" for the purposes of drug R&D research grants (or something to that effect).
Well, that just seems all backwards, now doesn't it. I understand the reason for this line of thinking but in the broader scheme of things, it doesn't make much sense to me. When I was first dxed I was told that MS has 2 things going against it in terms of funding. First, that it's a chronic disease rather than a fatal one and secondly, the relatively small population.

Quote:
Originally Posted by lady_express_44 View Post
I also suspect that "they" have a better idea of what is causing it, but until they can figure out how to stop/cure it, they aren't going to let the cat out of the bag.
Well, I'd love to hear you elaborate on this one if you're willing!
Bearygood is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
"Thanks for this!" says:
who moi (08-26-2008)