View Single Post
Old 12-16-2008, 12:50 PM
paula_w paula_w is offline
In Remembrance
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Florida
Posts: 3,904
15 yr Member
paula_w paula_w is offline
In Remembrance
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Florida
Posts: 3,904
15 yr Member
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ZucchiniFlower View Post
From another article:

Finding genetic markers for the placebo effect could raise ethical questions about how companies design their clinical trials, Furmark says. For example, "it could be tempting to screen all individuals and ... select only those with [the] nonresponsive phenotype [for the trial]."

Why is that an ethical question? It would be wonderful if one could exclude those that might exhibit a strong placebo effect from the trial. How is that possibly unethical?

http://sciencenow.sciencemag.org/cgi...ll/2008/1202/1
ZF,

I'm still somewhat in a fog today so if the logic is off here I'm sorry. But would it be better to just factor in the placebo genes [somehow] and still let those prone to placebo effect have a shot at the treatment? I'm not sure if that even makes sense, but wouldn't it be unethical to eliminate those with the genes from getting a potentially life saving treatment in time? Is that what they are saying?

paula
__________________
paula

"Time is not neutral for those who have pd or for those who will get it."
paula_w is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote