Quote:
Originally Posted by kejbrew
Dubious,
I must say that thou doest protest too much. Obviously you did not read my post closely enough, or you misconstrued my post, because there was really nothing to disagree with factually.
1.) Nowhere did I suggest that a MRI would not be useful. I only asked for information about the type of MRI numb had.
2.) The Mayo link was included to help explain the difference in a CT, MRI, and a myelogram. That link was informational only, and in no way attempted to suggest one method above any other.
In the future please try to be more careful and not take others words out of context.
Kindest regards,
 EJ |
But of course, EJ. I will be more careful. I know not what I am talking about and am not worthy. I bow to your hugeness and ask thou for forgiveness!
Yup, read it darn close enough. Even read it again. Begging your pardon, you were advocating myelograms because you had one, and unrealted and independantly, had a good surgical outcome. I am very happy for you. Good surgical outcomes are hard to come by. But in advocating a myelogram as you did ("it is very likely that the mylogram can reveal details not seen on the other tests"), in my opinion, is wreckless and going to get someone hurt (I've seen it happen).
Sorry, must have been the RSD-induced psychotic break. I better take another Xanex now...
With best regards
