|
Member
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Paradise
Posts: 855
|
|
|
Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Paradise
Posts: 855
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by buckwheat
Dear Everyone,
The problem with the test they are 50 to 70% inaccurate. I tested neg- as well, it's made by a clinical DX? You need to be seem by a LLMD if you think you could have this.
Much Love, Roz
|
Hi Roz,
I'll respectfully say this as nice as I can! I looked at the abstract that you supplied in your original post. It is a case report, which is about as low as you can reliably go in research methodology and still get printed. Further, the publication date is almost 20 years old! And there is no indication of whether this patient had type I or type II, but I suspect that by the way it was written, it was type I. As we all know, type II requires an identifiable nerve injury.
I know your heart is as good as gold, the only reason I even bring this up is so no one gets false hopes over this outdated case report! Love ya!
|