wow, tough crowd in here.

that guy, pastor or not, had every right to not cooperate in that search at that time. Just because the border patrol "said" a dog had signaled suspicion does not mean it actually happened.

Clearly, from the pastor's point of view, he was being unjustly detained.

The incident smacks of a police state action. He was not guilty just because he refused to submit.

It is similar to incidences at the airport. Remember the woman with a child's sippy cup? Being arrested as she tried to show a patrol woman that there was only water in the cup?

The border patrol was WAY out of line. For goodness sakes, we have Sheriff Joe Arpaio here.

Guilty before innocence. Scary stuff.