does this mean the generic is being repackaged into the brand name packs?THAT can/must be truly scary!

IF a generic is identical it should be no problem...but some generics vz brand names do have noticable differences in either quality controls or processing control issues.

A good example would be synthroid. My docs have always insisted on the brand name, and if I recall my readings correctly this is one that's justified. Others? I'm not so sure about.

All a doc has to do is check to off the box to not substitute for generic. OR not check off any box at all, in which a generic will be provided.
All said tho, for so many the co-pay is the bigger issue.
A real catch-22 in our society and a problem core to medical, insurance, and pharmacies goals, all in conflict with each other.

I think this would be a good rolling topic for all to discuss. As there are many instances when it's good and not..Costs aside. To me, the proof is efficacy regardless of costs. But, that's just me. Maybe a poll?

The most absurd aspect I've found is when docs check off 'generic OK' or don't specify, meaning a generic can be used... KNOWING there is NO generic. Kinky, actually.

Mel, sorry to get off your subject here, mainly: Alan. But, your post does bring up an important issue for all of us who come here. - j