View Single Post
Old 04-27-2009, 07:23 PM
Kitty's Avatar
Kitty Kitty is offline
Wisest Elder Ever
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Deep South
Posts: 21,576
15 yr Member
Kitty Kitty is offline
Wisest Elder Ever
Kitty's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Deep South
Posts: 21,576
15 yr Member
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Harry Z View Post
The results were based solely on MRI brain lesions. We know brain lesions come and go on their own in MS patients. There is remitting and relapsing episodes of the disease which will effect test results.

In other words, the accuracy of the MRI findings are suspect at best.

Harry
I agree. I'd never use an MRI as a gauge to determine the severity of my MS. You can have many lesions with little to no disability.....or just one lesion in just the right (or wrong) place and you can have severe disability.

I also agree that the Interferon therapies are not consistently successful. I think I read somewhere that they're successful in reducing progression in only 30% of those who take it. Somebody please correct me if I'm wrong....I'm just going from memory here.

Personally, the side effects and site effects were not worth it to me with such a low percentage of effectiveness. But, everyone's MS is different and everyone responds differently to treatment. If it seems to be working for you then go for it. For me, the pros must outweigh the cons......and Interferon treatment just didn't work for me.
__________________
These forums are for mutual support and information sharing only. The forums are not a substitute for medical advice, diagnosis or treatment provided by a qualified health care provider. Always consult your doctor before trying anything you read here.
Kitty is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote