I just re-read the article, trying to see if I missed something. He lists a
few possible causes and posts links to "prove" why the causes are false.
But, when it comes to proving his own theory, which even he admits is
speculation, he doesn't give any background as to how he developed it.
Where did he get this idea from? Who did he talk to? Did he read it
somewhere? There's nothing in the article to back up his claim that
TV is a cause of autism. When you post something like this on the
internet, shouldn't you have some proof to back it up with?