View Single Post
Old 06-25-2009, 07:50 PM
paula_w paula_w is offline
In Remembrance
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Florida
Posts: 3,904
15 yr Member
paula_w paula_w is offline
In Remembrance
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Florida
Posts: 3,904
15 yr Member
Default

yea i need to read again....is the wrieless part new?

thanks greg i didn't call the neuro about the MRI. He knows i'm reluctant.

Who would have thought we'd become bionic?]

thanks greg.

paula




Quote:
Originally Posted by GregW1 View Post
Paula,

I read the article in the Sentinel twice. Other than a reference to a better stim-adjuster, I couldn't find any info that would indicate this is anything other than slow media pick-up on DBS. The general reading public may never have heard of DBS, so the paper may have spiced it up by treating it as a new development. Again, somebody please correct me if I wrong.

There is, however, a new DBS procedure which I think is still in clinical trials, that targets the globus pallidus rather than the subthalamic nucleus. I'm sure there are others here that can explain the details of this alternative to DBS-STN.

Hope this helps.

Greg
__________________
paula

"Time is not neutral for those who have pd or for those who will get it."
paula_w is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote