View Single Post
Old 07-06-2009, 09:37 AM
Kitt Kitt is offline
Grand Magnate
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 4,440
15 yr Member
Kitt Kitt is offline
Grand Magnate
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 4,440
15 yr Member
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by echoes long ago View Post
I would really give it a lot of thought and seek some other opinions before I would consent to a nerve biopsy. It does permanent damage because the section of nerve is cut out and many people have reported long term or even permanent pain as a result. At the least that area will be permanently numb. Unless vasculitis is suspected it will usually only confirm that you have PN rather than to find a cause. Your emg has already confirmed that you have PN so think long and hard on this one. Early in my search for a cause I was referred by a neuro for a nerve biopsy. After researching it and talking to a few people on the old board I decided not to go ahead with it and am glad that i didnt.
They have better ways now then a nerve biopsy. It certainly can cause permanent damage, etc. and at the least it can be permanently numb.

I know that a person with CMT does not ever need one and should not have one. A skin biopsy is a non invasive way to go if needed; at least for CMT.
__________________
Kitt

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

"It is what it is."
Kitt is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote