View Single Post
Old 11-11-2009, 09:19 PM
Bob Dawson Bob Dawson is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 1,135
15 yr Member
Bob Dawson Bob Dawson is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 1,135
15 yr Member
Default Here is what they deleted

Here are the comments from Anuket that the Mayo Clinic deleted from the comments section of a video about Parkinson's research, concluding that at the least 1 in 5 Parkies is destructive, addicted to gambling and / or hypersexual. Anuket did not belief they have evidence to say that. So they deleted what she said.:
anuketscrusade (6 hours ago)
I beg who sees this to read the actual study - not just the abstract, the whole study google mayo clinic proceedings, 2009;84(4):310-316 the pramipexole package insert can be found at drugs@fda, search on pramipexole- check my facts, please!!
anuketscrusade (6 hours ago)
2)For 4 out of 7 patients, there is no stated temporal relationship btw initiation/increase or cessation/decrease in dopamine agonists & certain behavior in the absence of a temporal relationship, on what basis are you claiming the existence of an association between the drug and the behavior?
anuketscrusade (6 hours ago
3)2 out of those 4, in addition to having no stated temporal relationship, are footnoted as not clearly pathologic well, you cant have your cake and eat it too if they arent pathologic, then they are not eligible for inclusion in a study with pathological as an inclusion criterion
anuketscrusade (6 hours ago)

4)you define 2mg/day or greater as therapeutic dosage of pramipexole but according to the package insert, doses of 3 mg, 4.5 mg, and 6 mg per day of MIRAPEX tablets were not shown to provide any significant benefit beyond that achieved at a daily dose of 1.5 mg/day.
anuketscrusade (6 hours ago)

5)You exclude 28 of the 66 people taking agonists on the basis of this never before heard and according to the package insert completely erroneous categorization of their agonist dosage as subtherapeutic.
anuketscrusade (7 hours ago)
6)If you remove the patients who were included without any basis for inclusion, and include those without any basis for exclusion, you get 3 patients out of 66 taking agonists, which indicates a prevalence of 4.5%, or approximately ¼ that which you are claiming to have found
Bob Dawson is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote