View Single Post
Old 01-15-2010, 02:33 AM
alice md's Avatar
alice md alice md is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 884
10 yr Member
alice md alice md is offline
Member
alice md's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 884
10 yr Member
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CowgirlUp View Post
Has anyone heard of chemo. being effective for MG? I feel like it might be worth it to go through the torture for a little while in order to have a better life later.

P.S. Wanted to mention again how much I detest this disease.

Nicky

Well, Rituxan, which I'm about to start getting, is a form of chemotherapy. It's the chemo used for lymphoma, but it has been showing some promise in treating MG as well, especially people who are MuSK positive. I'm seronegative, but the doc wants to try it anyway, so I'm going to do it. I'll let you know what happens![/QUOTE]

Rituxan is not chemotherapy, it is immunotherapy.

we used to treat patients with lymphoma with chemotherapy, but now it is almost the mainstay of treatment to give immunochemotherapy.

the word chemotherapy doesn't really mean much. as any chemical given as treatment can be considered chemotherapy, including antibiotics.

it just becme a word for those medications that were given fror cancer, caused a lot of horrible side effects, like nausea, hair loss, etc.

hopefully we are gradually able to make our treatments for cancer much more targeted, and much less toxic.

the short term side effect profile of Rituxan is much more like IVIG then "chemotherapy". and long term it is probably much less then steroids.

alice
alice md is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote