Quote:
Originally Posted by Lynns409
Jim you bring up an interesting point. I think that part of the prevalence of RSD is a modern, first world lifestyle. Whenever I read a book or watch a history show on a different era, I always think "Man, I never would have survived during that time." But then I always remind myself that I wouldn't have been doing gymnastics all day every day in the 15th century. So the problem probably wouldn't have presented itself.
I just always think that this is an interesting question to ponder. And I wouldn't be surprised if the incidence of RSD is the same across all races. It's like any other condition- awareness levels predict diagnosis rates. People who do not have access to health care are not going to be diagnosed. You usually only see pronounced differences across races when the disease has a genetic origin- something like Tay-Sachs.
Lynn
|
Very true. Many folks in the US have a hell of a time getting a diagnosis let alone a third world country having the medical support and know how. As far as a modern ailment I doubt it. Keep in mind this disease was first identified during the American Civil War when a doctor Silas Weir Mitchell noticed gun shot wounds healing with no diminishing of the pain but spreading instead. And most likely was never pinned down through the ages. Can you imagine suffering from this disease in the 15th century? You'd most likely be pinned as a nut and would be cassed out. I bet if one was to research closely one could problably find what looks to be RSD many moons ago.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reflex_...etic_Dystrophy
"It is also theorized that certain people might be genetically predisposed to develop symptoms of RSD/CRPS after a significant or seemingly insignificant injury has been sustained.[17] These tests are being performed by The Reflex Sympathetic Dystrophy Syndrome Association (RSDSA), American RSD Hope, and Richard G. Boles, M.D. Research began in October 2008, but the outcome has yet to be released to the medical community.[18]"
There could very well be a genetic factor with this desease but would be hard to research because of its rarity and often misdiagnosed. But should be persued never the less, and perhaps it has in a limited way in the past. It could lead to treatment or cure if a contrast can be found between those who are predisposed to this disease and those who aren't.