Quote:
Originally Posted by legalmania
ok Christian, here it is I found it.
(6) Expedited appeals process. At some time after your initial determination has been reviewed, if you have no dispute with our findings of fact and our application and interpretation of the controlling laws, but you believe that a part of the law is unconstitutional, you may use the expedited appeals process. This process permits you to go directly to a Federal district court so that the constitutional issue may be resolved.
http://www.socialsecurity.gov/OP_Hom...5/405-0701.htm |
The way I read Christian's post, he
is disputing the findings of fact and disputes the application and interpretation of controlling laws. So how can this expedited appeals process be utilized when your definition says it is to be used when someone has
no dispute with the finding of fact and interpretation of law.
What is unconstitutional about his denial?