Quote:
Originally Posted by Janke
The way I read Christian's post, he is disputing the findings of fact and disputes the application and interpretation of controlling laws. So how can this expedited appeals process be utilized when your definition says it is to be used when someone has no dispute with the finding of fact and interpretation of law.
What is unconstitutional about his denial?
|
I would site constitutional law and disability discrimination, probably argue the equal protection clause. Of course I would have to see his evidence, he says he can't use his arms, he has doctors to testify to this. I really don't need to put that much thought into it because he has an attorney and hopefully will win soon.