View Single Post
Old 07-01-2010, 01:18 AM
fmichael's Avatar
fmichael fmichael is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: California
Posts: 1,239
15 yr Member
fmichael fmichael is offline
Senior Member
fmichael's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: California
Posts: 1,239
15 yr Member
Thumbs up Social Security Ruling 003-2P

Debby -

No bad at all. This is, in effect, brand new!

Whether promulgated in 2003 or last week, I am convinced that it's only been in the last year since it's actually being implemented within the system, without forcing everyone through a series of unnecessary appeals, so long as the patients' doctors have done their job:
A very key feature of the Ruling is its re-emphasis on the "treating physician rule." This concept provides that the findings and opinions of the treating specialist are entitled to deference, and possibly controlling weight, if they are supported and consistent with the clinical record. This again emphasizes the importance of consistent medical care with the appropriate specialists. [Emphasis added.]
But what I really know is that it worked for me on the first pass. So it's my position and I'm sticking with it.

Mike
fmichael is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
"Thanks for this!" says:
Sandel (07-02-2010)