View Single Post
Old 09-04-2010, 10:19 PM
alice md's Avatar
alice md alice md is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 884
10 yr Member
alice md alice md is offline
Member
alice md's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 884
10 yr Member
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by AnnieB3 View Post
I know you that most of you guys already do this or know how important this is, so this is mainly for any "newbies" who are in limbo.

If you don't have copies of all of your test results, get them. Why? Well, doctors not only don't have to tell you all the results they sometimes leave things out on purpose. For example, I have had atelectasis (a small collapse of a lung from my not being able to breathe in well enough from MG) on x-ray or CT which they haven't even told me about. If I know I have that, I use an incentive spirometer or breathe in deeply (if I can) to help alleviate it.

Case in point. I first noticed I had ptosis in March 2000. I went to see an MG "expert" in April. He pooh-poohed everything I told him, especially the part where I thought I might have MG. Some neuros do not like it when patients "think." Or talk. One of his comments, when I described how weak my muscles became when I ate food like a bagel (a soft, warm one) was "It takes a lot of stamina to chew a bagel." Not the comment of a nice doctor. He only ran the AChR antibody tests. They came back negative. The modulating antibody was at 18% on a range of 0 - 20%. Because of that one negative test, he didn't even do an EMG. I wondered back then too if an antibody result could be "on its way up." Two months later, I saw a neuro-ophthalmologist who said I indeed had ocular MG.

In March of 2002, my antibody tests were rerun. The doctor said he would do the AChR and the MuSK. Well, they did the AChR at a lab that wasn't as reliable as another one. After getting the results, he sent the vial meant for the MuSK lab to another lab to redo the AChR again. I never got a copy of the lab. Even after I requested the antibody tests specifically, I never got that second lab. The results were buried in his notes, which I often don't read. Why would I? He had undiagnosed my MG during that last appt. (when he knew the results), later dropping me as a patient and "terminating" me from the clinic. Why?

Nearly seven years later, when I was writing up complaints to our State's medical board about some doctors, I finally read those notes. I had a positive antibody test. SEVEN years of not knowing for absolutely sure that I had MG. Seven years of going to a neuro out of state and spending all that money. When I asked the clinic again for the labs, seven years later, they said they didn't exist. I did some digging and called the lab that did the original lab. They found it, thank goodness, and sent it to that first clinic which then sent it to me. Good grief.

The doctor in question had written in his notes that the antibody was "slightly" elevated. No where on the original lab did it say "slightly" or give a range of results like "slightly" or "moderately" or "highly" elevated. It simply said that it was H as in "high."

So why would a doctor keep a test result from a patient, allegedly? To keep his doctor pal, whom he mentioned during my last visit, from being part of a medical malpractice lawsuit. That first neuro had been dead wrong, had treated me poorly and not even done all the MG testing. All based on prejudice and whatever other reasons he had for not treating me well.

Doctors are human. They make mistakes, sometimes on purpose. Test results speak for themselves and you need to get ALL of yours if you want to, or need to, build a "case" for what is going on with your health. It's sad that it has to be this way sometimes. And, no, I never even hinted at suing anyone!!!

I've had so many examples of this throughout my life, where a significant test result is not given to me or told to me. So please don't assume that all is well just because a doctor says so. I'm not saying don't trust your doctors. You absolutely need to know the condition of your body and you can't fully know that without all of your test results.

This especially applies to breathing tests. So often, neuros will say it was a "lack of effort" causing the poor result. Those tests, when done by experts who keep you doing it consistently, are reliable and MIP and MEP reflect neuromuscular weakness. Also, getting a baseline reading of those tests are good so they can compare the results when you get worse.

I went through a significant amount of pain for years due to the "games" these doctors played and I wouldn't want any of you to go through that. Get your test results. Then get a second opinion.

Annie
Dear Annie,

As a physician, I want to say- "no, she is wrong, doctors aren't like that. "

but, as a patient, I can sadly say, that I paid a horrible price for thinking that way, and not realizing that although many (and I do hope most) are not, some definitely are.

why is that? why do people that supposedly dedicated their lives to help others act in such a way?

I wish I knew the answer to that. I wish I knew why people that don't really care about other people choose this profession. is this because their mother wanted them to be a doctor? who knows.

one of my peers in med. school used to say that his parents were very liberal in letting him decide on what he wants to do. he could choose if he wants to be a pediatrician, gynecologist, what ever. This guy hated medicine. he really wanted to be a mechanic, but his father- the dean and his mother, one of the leading teaching professors, would clearly not hear of that.

what kind of a physician has he become, I really don't know.
some of my colleagues keep on telling me how bothersome the patients are, how they keep on nagging them etc. etc. I would clearly not want any of them to be my physician, but you don't always know beforehand.

one more thing. Regardless of the reasons that Annie gave, I advise all my patients to keep a file of all their medical letters and test results with them. This is extremely helpful when they consult another physician. modern medicine is so specialized that one specialist could easily ignore or not be aware of what another one said or did. and more times then not, medications are given by one, that are contraindicated by another. the GP is supposed to organize it all, but they are not always able to keep up with everything.

I recently had a patient who went a series of very expensive tests, and was on the way to go a few more, just because none of those that saw her was aware of a new medication that was started by another physician involved in her care.

So, yes Annie, you are perfectly correct. patients should try and keep a track of all their medical letters and tests, and when they have concerns regarding their quality of care, ask to receive coppies of their charts. I have unfortunately learned that the hard way.

It is true that during a busy day in the clinic it is not always convenient to start printing test results. so patients should also be understaning to that, and not insist that it be done on the spot, but request that at some point they will receive it all.

patients should also understand that physicians are people and can make mistakes, not on purpose. those can be missinterpertation of tests, judgment errors and many more. even excellent, caring and dedicated physicians are error prone, as they are not gods.

alice
alice md is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
"Thanks for this!" says:
AnnieB3 (09-05-2010)