View Single Post
Old 11-05-2010, 04:59 PM
Conductor71's Avatar
Conductor71 Conductor71 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Michigan
Posts: 1,474
10 yr Member
Conductor71 Conductor71 is offline
Senior Member
Conductor71's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Michigan
Posts: 1,474
10 yr Member
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by paula_w View Post
Each one of us could be reading this from a different perspective. The media has a mind slant with its own slippery slope. We are used to being ignored. BUt now it's beyond going back. We want to say how we are defined. Why should someone who doesn't have it, define it?
Oh no, Paula. I am in complete agreement with you on the patient perspective that is missing. I just think in looking beyond dopamine, there is progress. No matter the type of treatment, there is a huge, gaping void in the involvement of patient perspectives. Heck, but then again I think that if they would have started a huge database of all of us giving complete medical histories, our life stories, all our demographics and then some, they would have been able to run checks for patterns and narrowed down environmental culprits, at the very least by now. That is something crude, basic, and simple that may have yielded important clues.

Laura
Conductor71 is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
"Thanks for this!" says:
anon72219 (11-06-2010)