View Single Post
Old 11-22-2010, 05:45 AM
Conductor71's Avatar
Conductor71 Conductor71 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Michigan
Posts: 1,474
10 yr Member
Conductor71 Conductor71 is offline
Senior Member
Conductor71's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Michigan
Posts: 1,474
10 yr Member
Default We have the dubious distinction...

Quote:
Originally Posted by swept View Post
its about economics and new advances are developed under such stirct regulation to protect us,that they become unavailable when released into the health system,because they are priced to return research revenue costs and make profit from illness


Our health care system is based on the premise that health care is a commodity like VCRs or computers and that it should be distributed according to the ability to pay in the same way that consumer goods are.
That's not what health care should be. Health care is a need; it's not a commodity, and it should be distributed according to need. If you're very sick, you should have a lot of it. If you're not sick, you shouldn't have a lot of it. But this should be seen as a personal, individual need, not as a commodity to be distributed like other marketplace commodities. That is a fundamental mistake in the way this country, and only this country, looks at health care. And that market ideology is what has made the health care system so dreadful, so bad at what it does.


Marcia Angell, M.D. and former editor of the New England Journal of Medicine and my new unsung super hero! This is from an interview with PBS.

Not only are we struggling with an incurable disease, we are players in the middle of a money making system that benefits from keeping us unwell. We are merely grist for the mill.

-Laura
Conductor71 is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote