View Single Post
Old 02-12-2011, 08:47 AM
lindylanka lindylanka is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,271
15 yr Member
lindylanka lindylanka is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,271
15 yr Member
Default

Fascinating reports, as are some of the others posted recently.

It is very interesting that people are hugely concerned for the safety aspects of such controversial treatments, where naturally occurring, and co-existing smaller life forms are used. Contrast this with the huge confidence and often unquestioned faith in chemical solutions in the round. People seem to have no fear overall fear of these substance many of which are destructive to these smaller life forms.

I am going somewhere with this, it is not just a criticism. For too long there has been an assumption that stamping out bacteria, parasites, viruses, so-called pests, etc is the way to human health and to food production and a whole host of other things. While it would seem logical that something like polio should be eradicated, and anopheles stopped from spreading malaria, and that antibiotics have in general been a blessing for the world, there has always been a dilemma - are we also destroying things that are beneficial.

I guess we have been, and maybe what people are finding out now will herald a new era of life sciences, which are dedicated to preserving things that we cannot do without, like our poor, devastated gastric flora! And a great many other things.

There is a lot to be said for viewing the whole of life as being interdependent, and some of the ills of the developed world have come from ignoring this proposition. There has to be a wider view.........

Lindy
lindylanka is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
"Thanks for this!" says:
olsen (02-12-2011), Sasha (02-12-2011), VICTORIALOU (02-12-2011)