This is the article I believe:
http://www.nytimes.com/2011/05/03/he...er=rss&emc=rss
No where does it state what high levels were.
How much fish oil had to consumed to give those "high" levels.
With nutrient research there is typically a back and forth of positive and negative outcomes. Some depend on who does the research and how the study participants were chosen.
I'll see later if I can find the study on PubMed... can't do it right this minute...but later I will try.
Quickly I found this that quotes a Harvard study showing the reverse:
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/craig-..._b_832661.html
__________________
All truths are easy to understand once they are discovered; the point is to discover them.-- Galileo Galilei
************************************
.
Weezie looking at petunias 8.25.2017
****************************
These forums are for mutual support and information sharing only. The forums are not a substitute for medical advice, diagnosis or treatment provided by a qualified health care provider. Always consult your doctor before trying anything you read here.