View Single Post
Old 07-07-2011, 02:33 PM
Bob Dawson Bob Dawson is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 1,135
15 yr Member
Bob Dawson Bob Dawson is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 1,135
15 yr Member
Default Thank you, Merck. Congratulations.

Dear Neurotalkers,
Sorry to bump this forward once again, but people are still reading the thread and this post brings at least that chapter to a more peaceful end. Sinemet shortage remains top secret, but top management at Merck have delivered a transparency policy that is a step in the right direction, and a leap ahead of their competitors. Merck just raised the bar.

Letter to:
Michael Rosenblatt, M.D., Merck executive vice president and chief medical officer
And
To Ken Frazier, the relatively new CEO of Merck
From Bob Dawson

I send thanks and gratitude to Merck for their new policy on transparency. This will not help us decipher the ever-mysterious story of the “global sinemet shortage”, as you are bound by a mysterious confidentiality agreement that should never have been signed. For the sinemet story, I remain completely critical.
But for the future, your new policy comes as a very pleasant surprise for all kinds of patients.
Merck just stepped ahead of its competitors in coming to terms with the need for transparency. Merck just raised the bar. Merck just adopted a new policy based entirely on principle. They have chosen a path that is harder for them but better for the human spirit, and better for science, and better for sharing information to speed up research, and better as one item that will help to build trust.

I got this good news from a Merck-critic far more entrenched than me (“a new Merck reviewed”). This is his address: http://anewmerckreviewed.wordpress.c...ency-measures/

I am placing this in that long thread about sinemet at Neurotalk. This does not answer our questions about sinemet, but it answers some questions about the future.

MERCK OPENS UP INFORMATION
Press release from Merck:

. . .Today Merck said the company is strengthening its publications policy as part of its continuing, voluntary commitment to increase transparency about how it conducts business.

Effective July 1, when Merck submits a manuscript on a study of an investigational or an approved medicine or vaccine to a biomedical journal, Merck will include the protocol and statistical analysis plan as part of the submission package. Merck previously supplied this material only upon request. Upon a journal’s acceptance of the manuscript for publication, Merck will provide the journal with the opportunity to post on its web site, at journal’s discretion, the key sections of the protocol, including the objectives and hypotheses, patient inclusion and exclusion criteria, study design and procedures, efficacy and safety measures, the statistical analysis plan, and any amendments relating to those sections.

It’s our responsibility to make available important information about our products and the science on which they are based, and do so in an objective, accurate and balanced way,” said Michael Rosenblatt, M.D., Merck executive vice president and chief medical officer.

“Proactively sharing our study protocols will enhance the exchange of ideas within the scientific and medical community, and ultimately lead to a better understanding of the benefits and risks of our products among health care professionals and patients. . .

And home came Ulysses over the wine-dark ocean, with dolphins leaping, and laurel leaves in his hair…

Thank you, Dr. Michael Rosenblatt
Thank you, Ken Frazier
That was a class act, that last bit, and I am grateful.
Signed,
Bob Dawson
Parkinson’s Underground

Last edited by Bob Dawson; 07-07-2011 at 02:38 PM. Reason: forgot title
Bob Dawson is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
"Thanks for this!" says:
lindylanka (07-07-2011)